Splunk AppDynamics

Disable Web Server HTTP Trace/Track Method Support Cross-Site Tracing Vulnerability

CommunityUser
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Hi

We are gearing up to be audited for PCI. How can I achieve the above result so that we can get a clean scan on our servers?

Here is more info:

TCP Port 9091

[root@01 ~]# netstat -putan | egrep "9091"
tcp        0      0 :::9091                     :::*                        LISTEN      2318/java

[root@01 ~]# ps aux | grep 2318
root       555  0.0  0.0 103320   844 pts/0    R+   14:42   0:00 grep 2318
root      2318  0.1  4.1 7854504 336264 ?      Sl   Feb10 151:56 /opt/appdynamics/machine-agent/jre/bin/java -Dlog4j.configuration=file:/opt/appdynamics/machine-agent/conf/logging/log4j.xml -jar /opt/appdynamics/machine-agent/machineagent.jar

[root@01 ~]# /opt/appdynamics/machine-agent/jre/bin/java -version
java version "1.8.0_74"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_74-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.74-b02, mixed mode)

Thanks

Kobus

Labels (1)
0 Karma

Saradhi_Pothara
Communicator

Hi Kobus,


Is this vulenaribility discovered on an AppDynamics Contoller endpoint? If so could you please share the endpoint URL?

Machine Agent is not a web server, so I do not see the connection.


Regards,
Saradhi

0 Karma

CommunityUser
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Hi

Thank you fo rthe reply.

In answer:

Well it is on one, and only one of our servers. It is not on an endpoint, just a normal server with the client installed.

So yes, I dont understand that either. I might just reinstall the client and see what happens.

Kobus

0 Karma

Saradhi_Pothara
Communicator
Hi Kobus,

Machine agent runs as a standalone java program. If there is any other
webserver installed on the same server as machine agent you might want to
check that web server.

Regards,
Saradhi
0 Karma

CommunityUser
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Well, there is, but the other webservers does not have this port 9091 open. Just this one process as I listed in my original post.

0 Karma

Saradhi_Pothara
Communicator

It would give a better idea how the vulnearibility scanner detects this vulnerability on 9091. It should be calling some end point otherwise I do not see an issue of XSS.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...