Getting Data In

Question about using virtual machines for intermediate forwarders

hacktastic
Path Finder

Hello folks,

I'm trying to puzzle out getting around SPL-34965 (WMI not load balancing), not inundating a single indexer (which is happening right now and screwing up my licensing) and keeping the the networking people happy by not asking for too many external IPs. I see that using an intermediate forwarder (HWF to avoid the done-key issue) is a solution. I completely understand why I wouldn't want to go virtual with the indexers and search head. But, can I get away with going virtual with intermediate forwarders? Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence?

We have about 725 LWFs sending to 3 indexers.

Thanks in advance.

0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Upcoming Webinar: Unmasking Insider Threats with Slunk Enterprise Security’s UEBA

Join us on Wed, Dec 10. at 10AM PST / 1PM EST for a live webinar and demo with Splunk experts! Discover how ...

.conf25 technical session recap of Observability for Gen AI: Monitoring LLM ...

If you’re unfamiliar, .conf is Splunk’s premier event where the Splunk community, customers, partners, and ...

A Season of Skills: New Splunk Courses to Light Up Your Learning Journey

There’s something special about this time of year—maybe it’s the glow of the holidays, maybe it’s the ...