Splunk Search

Why does the split function fail for list_split_failure_1 and 2 but succeeds for list_split_success?

rkoster
Explorer
| makeresults count=1
| eval list_split_failure_1 = "fail:,searching old data:,searching new"
| eval list_split_failure_2 = "fail:,searching old ata:,searching new"
| eval list_split_success = "fail:,searching old qata:,searching old dta:,searching old ta:,searching new"
| eval list_split_failure_1 = split(list_split_failure_1, ",")
| eval list_split_failure_2 = split(list_split_failure_2, ",")
| eval list_split_success = split(list_split_success, ",")


Can someone help me to understand why the split function fails for list_split_failure_1 and 2 but succeeds for list_split_success?

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

johnhuang
Motivator

This issue was discussed a while back and the consensus is that it's a bug introduced on 8.2.x+

https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Multivalue-field-which-contains-the-string-quot-data-q...

 

View solution in original post

johnhuang
Motivator

This issue was discussed a while back and the consensus is that it's a bug introduced on 8.2.x+

https://community.splunk.com/t5/Splunk-Search/Multivalue-field-which-contains-the-string-quot-data-q...

 

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Reuse: Word-play

This puzzle series (first published here) is based on analysing words.Some of the statements in your puzzle ...

Tuning Edge Processor in Hybrid Mode: What Limits Each Data Path

When you run Edge Processor in hybrid mode, alongside a Splunk heavy forwarder on the same host, two questions ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...