Splunk Search

Field Extraction

aknsun
Path Finder

Need some suggestion for field extraction.

Take this as an example:
I have a file path /opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/splunkd.log

There is already a field extraction done for this called file_name.

I would like to do a filed extraction with just the Directory path ( /opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/) and name dir_name.

The problem arises when I try to do a new extraction, as the path is sort of already used by file_name and splunk mentions that I need "To highlight text that is already part of an existing extraction, first turn off the existing extractions"

My doubt here is. If I turn of the existing extraction and then create one for dir_name, would I still be able to use file_name or does that get over-ridden by the new extraction?

Thanks,
AKN

0 Karma

to4kawa
Ultra Champion
| makeresults 
| eval file_name="/opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/splunkd.log" 
| rex field=file_name "(?<dir_name>\/.*\/)"

Hi, how about this?

0 Karma

vnravikumar
Champion

Hi

Check this

| makeresults 
| eval path="/opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/splunkd.log" 
| rex field=path "(^(?P<dir_name>.+)\/)([^\/]+)$"

or

| makeresults 
| eval path="/opt/splunk/var/log/splunk/splunkd.log" 
| eval dir_name=replace(path,"(\/[^\/]+)$","")
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Observability Unlocked: Kubernetes Monitoring with Splunk Observability Cloud

  Ready to master Kubernetes and cloud monitoring like the pros?Join Splunk’s Growth Engineering team for an ...

Wrapping Up Cybersecurity Awareness Month

October might be wrapping up, but for Splunk Education, cybersecurity awareness never goes out of season. ...

🌟 From Audit Chaos to Clarity: Welcoming Audit Trail v2

&#x1f5e3; You Spoke, We Listened  Audit Trail v2 wasn’t written in isolation—it was shaped by your voices.  In ...