Splunk Enterprise Security

CIM help

splunkcol
Builder

I'm reviewing the logs to make sure the fields match the Splunk Enterprise Security CIM and datamodels.

The query shows me this percentage, understanding that they are the fields that are required versus the fields that it is finding, in this order of ideas, to adjust these fields I must create an alias or I must perform an "extract" either by regular expressions or tabs?

cp_log.png

cp_log2.png

0 Karma
1 Solution

rajashekar_s
Path Finder

Per documentation, for example the action field in network traffic datamodel, prescribed values are allowed, blocked and teardown. But you have many values under action field. As suggested above, you can create a calculated field like

| eval action=case((action="xxx" OR action="yyy"),"allowed",1=1,"blocked")

Doing this on all recommended fields will increase you compliance %

View solution in original post

rajashekar_s
Path Finder

Per documentation, for example the action field in network traffic datamodel, prescribed values are allowed, blocked and teardown. But you have many values under action field. As suggested above, you can create a calculated field like

| eval action=case((action="xxx" OR action="yyy"),"allowed",1=1,"blocked")

Doing this on all recommended fields will increase you compliance %

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Yes, you need to extract fields or create aliases to increase your CIM compliance.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | Why did the turkey cross the road?

November 2025 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Enter the Agentic Era with Splunk AI Assistant for SPL 1.4

  🚀 Your data just got a serious AI upgrade — are you ready? Say hello to the Agentic Era with the ...

Feel the Splunk Love: Real Stories from Real Customers

Hello Splunk Community,    What’s the best part of hearing how our customers use Splunk? Easy: the positive ...