Getting Data In

Should we use heavy forwarders as an intermediate layer between the forwarders and the indexers?

danielbb
Motivator

We had this severe issue last week - What can be done when the parsing and aggregation queues are filled up?

Since it took us days to figure it out and the entire indexer cluster was compromised and it took 11 hours with Support on the line to detect it, I wonder whether in general an heavy forwarder layer is a good idea.

Tags (1)
0 Karma

mydog8it
Builder

What problem are you trying to solve by adding a heavy forwarder environment?

0 Karma

danielbb
Motivator

Reducing load on the indexers and isolating issues as I pointed to in the question...

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielbb,
I use HFs only when I need them (separated networks or syslogs), if I can I prefer to directly send logs from UFs to Indexers.

Maybe you should understand (with Support help) why you had the above problem, I don't think that an additional HF's layer could solve your problem, probably it could generate more queue problems.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Observability Simplified: Combining User Experience, Application Performance & ...

Tech Talk Observability Simplified: Combining User Experience, Application Performance & Network ...

Event Series May & June: From Network Visibility to Service Intelligence

Unifying the Network: Moving from Alert Noise to Service Intelligence with Splunk ITSI In today’s hybrid ...

Global Splunk User Group Events: May + June 2026

Your Splunk Community Awaits: Discover Upcoming User Group Events Worldwide    Staying ahead in the fast-paced ...