Getting Data In

Should we use heavy forwarders as an intermediate layer between the forwarders and the indexers?

danielbb
Motivator

We had this severe issue last week - What can be done when the parsing and aggregation queues are filled up?

Since it took us days to figure it out and the entire indexer cluster was compromised and it took 11 hours with Support on the line to detect it, I wonder whether in general an heavy forwarder layer is a good idea.

Tags (1)
0 Karma

mydog8it
Builder

What problem are you trying to solve by adding a heavy forwarder environment?

0 Karma

danielbb
Motivator

Reducing load on the indexers and isolating issues as I pointed to in the question...

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielbb,
I use HFs only when I need them (separated networks or syslogs), if I can I prefer to directly send logs from UFs to Indexers.

Maybe you should understand (with Support help) why you had the above problem, I don't think that an additional HF's layer could solve your problem, probably it could generate more queue problems.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Catalog Is Now Generally Available on Splunk Cloud Platform

A Unified View of Your Data  Security logs, application events, business data, and historical telemetry often ...

Your Path to AgenticOps: AI Experiences for Every Splunk Practitioner

Your Path to AgenticOps: AI Experiences for Every Splunk Practitioner   Watch on demand us for a demo-driven ...