Getting Data In

Should we use heavy forwarders as an intermediate layer between the forwarders and the indexers?

danielbb
Motivator

We had this severe issue last week - What can be done when the parsing and aggregation queues are filled up?

Since it took us days to figure it out and the entire indexer cluster was compromised and it took 11 hours with Support on the line to detect it, I wonder whether in general an heavy forwarder layer is a good idea.

Tags (1)
0 Karma

mydog8it
Builder

What problem are you trying to solve by adding a heavy forwarder environment?

0 Karma

danielbb
Motivator

Reducing load on the indexers and isolating issues as I pointed to in the question...

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielbb,
I use HFs only when I need them (separated networks or syslogs), if I can I prefer to directly send logs from UFs to Indexers.

Maybe you should understand (with Support help) why you had the above problem, I don't think that an additional HF's layer could solve your problem, probably it could generate more queue problems.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Event Series: The Agentic SOC: Trust Before Autonomy

AI is fundamentally changing security operations, but true progress requires more than just automation—it ...

Free Professional Services for .conf26 Attendees

This year at .conf26, we are doing something a little different. We are bringing the best minds from ...

Defend at Machine Speed: Your Guide to Security Sessions at .conf26

Splunk .conf26   With threats moving at machine speed and attack surfaces expanding across hybrid ...