Splunk Search

strftime() showing different time

wuming79
Path Finder

I converted my timeStampLight with strftime() but all my time was formatted to 31-12-9999 23:59:59 when I table time .
My timeStampLight is actually showing Epoch time format when I table timeStampLight. The format "%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S" should be correct as I managed to get my timestamp for the other log.

Any idea what went wrong with this one??

alt text

alt text

0 Karma
1 Solution

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi wuming79,
what is your timeStampLight value?
try to divide by 1000 and then apply strftime.

| eval timeStampLight=strftime(timeStampLight/1000,"%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S")

Bye.
Giuseppe

View solution in original post

sideview
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

It looks like your timeStampLight field isn't actually an epochtime value (seconds since the epoch), but rather milliseconds since the epoch, ie epochtime*1000. So @cusello's suggestion to divide by 1000 before strftime should work for you.

0 Karma

wuming79
Path Finder

ah thanks!

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi wuming79,
what is your timeStampLight value?
try to divide by 1000 and then apply strftime.

| eval timeStampLight=strftime(timeStampLight/1000,"%d-%m-%Y %H:%M:%S")

Bye.
Giuseppe

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Event Series: Telemetry Pipeline Management

Balancing Scale and Spend: Gaining Control Over High-Volume Metrics in Splunk Observability Cloud As ...

Kick the Tires Before You Commit: A Hands-On Tour of the Splunk Observability Cloud ...

Evaluating an enterprise observability platform usually goes like this: fill out a form, get a free trial with ...

Deep insights, no barriers: Splunk Observability Cloud Free Edition

As software delivery cycles continue to accelerate, observability shouldn’t be a luxury — it should be a ...