Splunk Search

how to: count(Values) where status=0

deanilol
Explorer

So I have the columns "Values" and "Status" and I only want to count Values where the status is zero. How can I do this?

here is my search:

source="*\\XML\\Example_Result\\Event_meter.xml" | table EventID EventName Value Status | join type=left EventID [search source="*\\XML\\Example_Result\\Event_map.xml" | where  EventType="Transaction" | table EventID EventName] | where EventID!=-1 | chart count(Value where status!=0) AS PASS, count(Value where status=0) AS FAIL by EventID

Thanks!

Tags (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

aweitzman
Motivator

You want to use the following construction:

chart count(eval(status!=0)) as PASS count(eval(status=0)) as FAIL

(Question: Why the join? You already have EventName in the main search.)

View solution in original post

ngatchasandra
Builder

Hi,
Try, if you want to count only the values where status is 0, you can do this:

source="XMLExample_ResultEvent_meter.xml" | table EventID EventName Value Status | join type=left EventID [search source="XMLExample_ResultEvent_map.xml" | where EventType="Transaction" | table EventID EventName] | where EventID!=-1 OR  status==0 |chart count(Value) AS PASS  by EventID
0 Karma

aweitzman
Motivator

You want to use the following construction:

chart count(eval(status!=0)) as PASS count(eval(status=0)) as FAIL

(Question: Why the join? You already have EventName in the main search.)

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Automatic Discovery Part 1: What is Automatic Discovery in Splunk Observability Cloud ...

If you’ve ever deployed a new database cluster, spun up a caching layer, or added a load balancer, you know it ...

Real-Time Fraud Detection: How Splunk Dashboards Protect Financial Institutions

Financial fraud isn't slowing down. If anything, it's getting more sophisticated. Account takeovers, credit ...

Splunk + ThousandEyes: Correlate frontend, app, and network data to troubleshoot ...

 Are you tired of troubleshooting delays caused by siloed frontend, application, and network data? We've got a ...