Splunk Search

field attaches too much data

seanlon11
Path Finder

The log entry is:

2011-04-20 01:04:12,026 [DEBUG] com.company.ldap.SpringLdapDao.java(?) - **username=ahall** returned no groups, which probably means the user needs to be assigned groups by security
2011-04-19 18:06:49,424 [DEBUG] com.company.ldap.SpringLdapDao.java(?) - **username=frozndrk** returned no groups, which probably means the user needs to be assigned groups by security

I would expect to see a list of usernames with the simple values (e.g. ahall, frozndrk), but in reality, what I see for the username field is:

  • ahall returned no groups
  • frozndrk returned no groups

In some odd way, it is also grabbing data to the comma. I only want the username, and not the junk after it.

Why is this happening?

Thanks,
Sean

Tags (1)
1 Solution

dwaddle
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Is this a field extraction you've defined, or is Splunk auto-extracting it? It sounds like maybe you need to define a slightly different regex for this. Try this as a test, and see how it does with values for test_username.

returned no groups | rex "username=(?<test_username>.*) returned no groups"

You can add this to props.conf for your sourcetype using something like:

[mysourcetype]
EXTRACT-username = username=(?<username>.*) returned no groups

View solution in original post

dwaddle
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Is this a field extraction you've defined, or is Splunk auto-extracting it? It sounds like maybe you need to define a slightly different regex for this. Try this as a test, and see how it does with values for test_username.

returned no groups | rex "username=(?<test_username>.*) returned no groups"

You can add this to props.conf for your sourcetype using something like:

[mysourcetype]
EXTRACT-username = username=(?<username>.*) returned no groups

dwaddle
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

It's hard to say for 100% sure without digging through your configuration. You could always add the above extraction to props.conf for your sourcetype. See update to answer...

0 Karma

seanlon11
Path Finder

I have looked through my existing Field Extractions, and I do not see anything related to this particular username. So I think it appears to be Splunk making this extraction.

Using your inline extraction above retrieves the usernames as expected for the test_username field.

Any idea why Splunk would extract usernames wrong? What configuration can I check to ensure it is not something I have done?

Thanks,
Sean

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | What travels the world but is also stuck in place?

April 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Discover New Use Cases: Unlock Greater Value from Your Existing Splunk Data

Realizing the full potential of your Splunk investment requires more than just understanding current usage; it ...

Continue Your Journey: Join Session 2 of the Data Management and Federation Bootcamp ...

As data volumes continue to grow and environments become more distributed, managing and optimizing data ...