Splunk Search

command.search.kv performance

rettops
Path Finder

We have a search that is spending most of its time in command.search.kv. If we give it a search which doesn't need any fields, like:

index=myindex sourcetype=mytype | stats count

it takes 1.8 seconds to count the 104,000 events (that alone seems high).

If instead we give it any search which would cause it to extract fields, e.g.:

index=myindex sourcetype=mytype myfield=val1 | stats count

then the time jumps up to 9 seconds, almost all of which is in command.search.kv.

We have no custom field extractions, field transformations, field aliases or tags. Each data item does have 101 fields, but the search in question really only needs 8 of them. Is there any way to speed things up? For example, is there a way to tell Splunk to turn off all of the automatic field extractions and have it use only some user defined ones? Alternatively, is there any way to debug what's happening during command.search.kv?

Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You can set KV_MODE to none in props.conf to turn off automatic extraction of key-value pairs.

View solution in original post

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You can set KV_MODE to none in props.conf to turn off automatic extraction of key-value pairs.

landen99
Motivator

Extractions only happen for fields needed by the search.

0 Karma

rettops
Path Finder

I forgot to mention - the 9 seconds is in 'fast' mode search. In verbose mode it jumps to 18 seconds.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...