Splunk Search

Why is my TIME_FORMAT regular expression in props.conf not working for an index time extraction?

sreejith2k2
Explorer

HI I am using following regular expression for the index time extraction in the props.conf. For some reason, it is not extracting properly.

Event: 2017-03-15T11:30:02.609835+00:00 postfix/pickup[19819]: 89389386: uid=0 from user1

I have defined my sourcetype as mail.

[source::...mail]
sourcetype=mail

[mail]
SHOULD_LINEMERGE = false
TIME_FORMAT = %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6Q%:z
TIME_PREFIX = ^
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)
MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 30
TRUNCATE=5000

Also, is there any websites i can test the TIME_FORMAT regular expression similar to regex101.com?

0 Karma
1 Solution

jwelch_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

What is the source of the data? is it /var/log/mail/*.log and how is it coming to the indexer? Is there a UF

Other things I noticed:
increase MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 32

And it is always best to do your LINE_BREAKER like so
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}.\d{6}+\d{2}:\d{2}

View solution in original post

0 Karma

jwelch_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

What is the source of the data? is it /var/log/mail/*.log and how is it coming to the indexer? Is there a UF

Other things I noticed:
increase MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 32

And it is always best to do your LINE_BREAKER like so
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}.\d{6}+\d{2}:\d{2}

0 Karma

sreejith2k2
Explorer

HI Welch,

Thanks for the answer. There were 2 issues

  1. MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD
  2. [source::...mail] - i have put only 2 dots in my props.conf instead of 3.
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

The TIME_FORMAT attribute does not use regex strings.
I'm not aware of any website for testing time format strings, but you can do it in a search window. Try something like this:

| makeresults | eval TS="2017-03-15T11:30:02.609835+00:00" | eval epoch=strptime(TS,"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6Q%:z") | table TS epoch

If the format string is bad, epoch will be null.

Your format string works for me in search, but I haven't tried it at index time. You might want to try this alternative: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6N%z".

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.

sreejith2k2
Explorer

Thanks Rich for your search. This search helped me in reducing the time in doing the testing..

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

See your relevant APM services, dashboards, and alerts in one place with the updated ...

As a Splunk Observability user, you have a lot of data you have to manage, prioritize, and troubleshoot on a ...

Index This | What goes away as soon as you talk about it?

May 2025 Edition Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!  We’re back with this month’s ...

What's New in Splunk Observability Cloud and Splunk AppDynamics - May 2025

This month, we’re delivering several new innovations in Splunk Observability Cloud and Splunk AppDynamics ...