Splunk Search

Why is my TIME_FORMAT regular expression in props.conf not working for an index time extraction?

sreejith2k2
Explorer

HI I am using following regular expression for the index time extraction in the props.conf. For some reason, it is not extracting properly.

Event: 2017-03-15T11:30:02.609835+00:00 postfix/pickup[19819]: 89389386: uid=0 from user1

I have defined my sourcetype as mail.

[source::...mail]
sourcetype=mail

[mail]
SHOULD_LINEMERGE = false
TIME_FORMAT = %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6Q%:z
TIME_PREFIX = ^
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)
MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 30
TRUNCATE=5000

Also, is there any websites i can test the TIME_FORMAT regular expression similar to regex101.com?

0 Karma
1 Solution

jwelch_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

What is the source of the data? is it /var/log/mail/*.log and how is it coming to the indexer? Is there a UF

Other things I noticed:
increase MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 32

And it is always best to do your LINE_BREAKER like so
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}.\d{6}+\d{2}:\d{2}

View solution in original post

0 Karma

jwelch_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

What is the source of the data? is it /var/log/mail/*.log and how is it coming to the indexer? Is there a UF

Other things I noticed:
increase MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD = 32

And it is always best to do your LINE_BREAKER like so
LINE_BREAKER = ([\r\n]+)\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}.\d{6}+\d{2}:\d{2}

0 Karma

sreejith2k2
Explorer

HI Welch,

Thanks for the answer. There were 2 issues

  1. MAX_TIMESTAMP_LOOKAHEAD
  2. [source::...mail] - i have put only 2 dots in my props.conf instead of 3.
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

The TIME_FORMAT attribute does not use regex strings.
I'm not aware of any website for testing time format strings, but you can do it in a search window. Try something like this:

| makeresults | eval TS="2017-03-15T11:30:02.609835+00:00" | eval epoch=strptime(TS,"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6Q%:z") | table TS epoch

If the format string is bad, epoch will be null.

Your format string works for me in search, but I haven't tried it at index time. You might want to try this alternative: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%6N%z".

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.

sreejith2k2
Explorer

Thanks Rich for your search. This search helped me in reducing the time in doing the testing..

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Observability Unlocked: Kubernetes Monitoring with Splunk Observability Cloud

 Ready to master Kubernetes and cloud monitoring like the pros? Join Splunk’s Growth Engineering team for an ...

Update Your SOAR Apps for Python 3.13: What Community Developers Need to Know

To Community SOAR App Developers - we're reaching out with an important update regarding Python 3.9's ...

October Community Champions: A Shoutout to Our Contributors!

As October comes to a close, we want to take a moment to celebrate the people who make the Splunk Community ...