Splunk Search

Why is a function as 3-rd arg in the "replace" function not evaluating capturing groups?

philbond
Observer

Hi all,

Due to utf16/8-mismatch, I find a lot of utf16 \xnn chars in my events; this makes the json-parser  kind of losing it.

So I want to get the right utf8 chars out of a dictionary json-table by doing:

f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})",json_extract(utfx,"{}.\1"))

The dictionary simply looks like [{"00":"utf8char-1"}, ..., {"AE":"é"},...]

But this doesn't seem to work, the event even gets nilled completely.

Something explicit like this does seem to work though: (here for instance, all utf16 \xAE chars get replaced by the "é" char:
f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})",json_extract(utfx,"{}.9E"))

or this:

f=replace(_raw,"\\\\x([0-9a-fA-F]{2})","\1")), which simply removes the "\x"

...so is it like the capt.groups of the regex in replace() is not evaluated if it is arg to another function io a plain string?

Tx.

0 Karma

philbond
Observer

..bump..

Anybody??

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.

Can’t make it to .conf25? Join us online!

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Community Content Calendar, September edition

Welcome to another insightful post from our Community Content Calendar! We're thrilled to continue bringing ...

Splunkbase Unveils New App Listing Management Public Preview

Splunkbase Unveils New App Listing Management Public PreviewWe're thrilled to announce the public preview of ...

Leveraging Automated Threat Analysis Across the Splunk Ecosystem

Are you leveraging automation to its fullest potential in your threat detection strategy?Our upcoming Security ...