Splunk Search

Use named backreference in the subsequent rex command

Murali2888
Communicator

Hi All,

Can you let me know how we can use a named backreference in the subsequent rex command? That is pass the value of the named backreference to the next rex command.

I am trying something like below which is not providing the desired result.

rex "<tag1>(?P<NamedField1>[^<]+" | rex "<tag2>?(P=NamedField1)</tag2><tag3>(?P<NamedField2>)" | table NamedField2

If someone could point out some documentation around this that would be very helpful.

0 Karma

maciep
Champion

Not exactly what you're asking, but you can use \n to represent a previously captured group in the same rex command. So in your case, something like

rex "<tag1>(?P<NamedField1>[^<]+").+<tag2>\1</tag2><tag3>(?P<NamedField2>)" 

Although I'm pretty sure i found a way to substitute field names in the rex too, but don't remember and could be mistaken.

0 Karma

Murali2888
Communicator

Thanks maciep.

I had this option, but unfortunately the xml structure is quite redundant and complex which would not allow using a single rex command. Nevertheless, I had found some workaround with eval command.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Monitoring AI Agents with Splunk Observability Cloud

Let’s say I’m running a travel planning AI app in production. A user asks for three concise hotel options in ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Tiling

This puzzle (first published here) is based on finding groups of tessellated tiles (inspired by floor tiles I ...

SOK it to Me: Top 3 Benefits of Using Splunk Operator on Kubernetes that’ll Make ...

    Thursday, July 9, 2026  |  11:00AM–12:00PM PDT Duration: 1 hour (includes Q&A) Managing can feel like a ...