Splunk Search

Search help: remove intersection of two sets from the first set

Genti
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

A customer asked this search question a few days ago. I thought it was a good one for answers.

Assume you have two datasets where you can use a JOIN to find the intersection (based on a field). How can i then modify the search to list the events in the first data set that do not also show up in the second dataset?

Here's a simple example:

set1.log
May 31 23:00:01 MAC=a
May 31 23:00:05 MAC=b
May 31 23:00:06 MAC=c
May 31 23:00:07 MAC=d

set2.log
Jun 01 00:00:01 MAC=d
Jun 01 00:00:05 MAC=e
Jun 01 00:00:06 MAC=f
Jun 01 00:00:07 MAC=g

Using:
source=set1.log | JOIN MAC [search set2.log] i should get the intersection: d

What should my search be, in order to get set1 - intersection of set1 and set2 (in other words, set1 - set2)?

0 Karma
1 Solution

Genti
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

This can be achieved by the following search:

source="set1.log" | JOIN type=left MAC [search source="set2.log" | eval x=1] | Where NOT x=1

Explanation:

the subsearch will find events in set2.log and add a new field, x=1 to the event. (that is for D, E, F, G, the field x=1 will be associated to the events)

Then, were doing a LEFT JOIN, on the field MAC (which will return A B C D) , but we are leaving out those events for which x=1 (hence we are leaving out D).

The final result then becomes: A, B and C, that is, set1 - set2

View solution in original post

0 Karma

kristian_kolb
Ultra Champion

I'd assume that the following would be more efficient, but I haven't tried it out.

source=set1.log NOT [search source=set2.log | dedup MAC | fields + MAC ]

i.e find all MACs from set2, then show all events from set1 whose MAC addresses do not match the subsearch.

/kristian

0 Karma

Genti
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

This can be achieved by the following search:

source="set1.log" | JOIN type=left MAC [search source="set2.log" | eval x=1] | Where NOT x=1

Explanation:

the subsearch will find events in set2.log and add a new field, x=1 to the event. (that is for D, E, F, G, the field x=1 will be associated to the events)

Then, were doing a LEFT JOIN, on the field MAC (which will return A B C D) , but we are leaving out those events for which x=1 (hence we are leaving out D).

The final result then becomes: A, B and C, that is, set1 - set2

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | What travels the world but is also stuck in place?

April 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Discover New Use Cases: Unlock Greater Value from Your Existing Splunk Data

Realizing the full potential of your Splunk investment requires more than just understanding current usage; it ...

Continue Your Journey: Join Session 2 of the Data Management and Federation Bootcamp ...

As data volumes continue to grow and environments become more distributed, managing and optimizing data ...