Splunk Search

Reassign (or keep) variable in eval's IF statement

kevintelford
Path Finder

I have two variables and based on one would like to possible change the value of the other:

.. | eval a="foo" | eval b="some value" | eval a=if(match(b, "kittens"), "bar", a)

So if b contains 'kittens' make a's value equal 'bar', otherwise keep it 'foo'. Is this possible? As it stands now a only ever has a value when b contains 'kittens'.

Thanks,
Kevin

Tags (3)
1 Solution

fk319
Builder

well it seems it should work, so I went to my code to see how I implemented it, I ended up using a case command with the last expression as 1==1.

 eval a=case(match(b, "kittens"), "bar", 1==1,a)

It seems that I had the same issue also, and this was how I was able to get it to work.

View solution in original post

fk319
Builder

well it seems it should work, so I went to my code to see how I implemented it, I ended up using a case command with the last expression as 1==1.

 eval a=case(match(b, "kittens"), "bar", 1==1,a)

It seems that I had the same issue also, and this was how I was able to get it to work.

kevintelford
Path Finder

Cool deal, too bad it doesn't work with if as well, but this will do just fine. Thanks!

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk App Dev Quarterly Roundup: AI, Agents, and Innovation!

Another quarter, another wave of innovation. From complex integrations to pushing the limits ...

Federated Search for Dynamic Data Self Storage Is Now Generally Available on Splunk ...

 Splunk is excited to announce the General Availability of Federated Search for Dynamic Data Self Storage ...

Index This | What has many keys but can’t unlock a door?

July 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...