Splunk Search

Ordering Columns Not Working

matthewcanty
Communicator

http://splunk-base.splunk.com/answers/49712/can-we-sort-command-for-sorting-the-table-records-rowwis...

Hi All,

I have a column chart and want to order the columns. The above link isn't quite what I am looking for. My search query is as follows, and works all apart from I'd like it ordering.

host="*90*" FeedSource | search Fixture>0 | stats max(_time) As LatestTime By Action | eval Gap=time()-LatestTime | chart last(Gap) by Action`

How can I order the fields such as CACHE_INSERT CACHE_UPDATE etc?

Many thanks in advance.

0 Karma
1 Solution

lguinn2
Legend

I am not sure this will work, but try putting the table command at the end of your search, listing the fields in the order that you want them to appear. Be sure to list them all!

host="*90*" FeedSource Fixture>0 
| stats max(_time) As LatestTime By Action 
| eval Gap=time()-LatestTime 
| chart last(Gap) as lastGap by Action
| table CACHE_INSERT CACHE_UPDATE

I do see some problems with this. First time() is the current wall clock time - even if you want the "current" time, I would use now(). now() is when the search began, and so it will be consistent for all events in this search. But time() will vary based on how long this search takes to run.

The second problem is that your table command must list all the values of Action. If these change, then your search must be updated.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

lguinn2
Legend

I am not sure this will work, but try putting the table command at the end of your search, listing the fields in the order that you want them to appear. Be sure to list them all!

host="*90*" FeedSource Fixture>0 
| stats max(_time) As LatestTime By Action 
| eval Gap=time()-LatestTime 
| chart last(Gap) as lastGap by Action
| table CACHE_INSERT CACHE_UPDATE

I do see some problems with this. First time() is the current wall clock time - even if you want the "current" time, I would use now(). now() is when the search began, and so it will be consistent for all events in this search. But time() will vary based on how long this search takes to run.

The second problem is that your table command must list all the values of Action. If these change, then your search must be updated.

0 Karma

lguinn2
Legend

Would it make sense to use the stats command instead of the chart command?

0 Karma

lguinn2
Legend

Sorry - didn't know this was a RT search - then time() IS a better choice.

0 Karma

matthewcanty
Communicator

Thanks, seems to have had the same effect as in the link I posted in my question. Also using now() in a real-time search causes the results to gradually move into greater negative values.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Modern Navigation: A New Era of Splunk User Experience

We are excited to introduce the Modern Navigation feature in the Splunk Platform, available to both cloud and ...

Detection Engineering Office Hours: Real-World Troubleshooting & Q&A

[REGISTER HERE] This thread is for the Community Office Hours session on Detection Engineering Office Hours: ...

Developer Spotlight with Mika Borner

From Hackathon Winner to Enterprise Leader    Mika Borner, CEO and Founder of Datapunctum AG, has been ...