Splunk Search

How to get result for field value difference?

EvansB
Path Finder

Working with this query, I'm hoping to get only results where field values are greater than the other.

 

 

index="index*"
| eval MonthNumber=strftime(_time,"%m") 
| chart eval(round(avg(durationMs), 0)) AS avg_durationMs by properties.url, MonthNumber 
| rename 04 AS "Apr", 05 AS "May"

 

 

 I want to get only results of where Apr values is greater than May by 10

EvansB_1-1653334771444.png

 

Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

If you only want to see results where the "May" number is greater than the "Apr" number then add a where command to the query.

| where May > Apr

 

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

EvansB
Path Finder

This gives me general results. I need results that are only greater than 10 and beyond. This is for the purpose of setting up an alert when values between May and Apr is greater than 10

Thanks

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Change the where command to test for the desired difference.

 

| where May > Apr+10

 

 

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

EvansB
Path Finder

Appreciate your assistance

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk App Dev Quarterly Roundup: AI, Agents, and Innovation!

Another quarter, another wave of innovation. From complex integrations to pushing the limits ...

Federated Search for Dynamic Data Self Storage Is Now Generally Available on Splunk ...

 Splunk is excited to announce the General Availability of Federated Search for Dynamic Data Self Storage ...

Index This | What has many keys but can’t unlock a door?

July 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...