Splunk Search

How to extract curly brackets in regular expression

ssaenger
Communicator

Hi,

I am having a problem extracting fields that have curly brackets {}
I have the log file line;
2015.06.24 11:55:13.567;:;12.34.567.241;:;somehost;:;21947UIGHFKD99HKW8R;:;deviceId;:;F90HSDUC0A49A2C;:;1001;:;Ref=0003313C;:;303;:;320;:;28;:;0xA5;:;co.cab.infra.exception.ApplicationException: tlv ids of DeviceId=DeviceId{DeviceId='27896RAWG96B'} is null or empty; applicationInstanceId=APPLICATION_INSTANCE_3;:;siteId;:;siteUid;:;

and i am using the reg ex to extract the fields;

(?<date_time>\d{4}\.\d{2}\.\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3});:;(?<ip>\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+);:;(?<host>[a-z0-9]+);:;(?<requester_id>[0-9A-F]+);:;(?<req_id>.+);:;(?<drm_domain_id>.+);:;(?<status>.+);:;(?<data>.+);:;(?<request_type>.+);:;(?<device_id>.+);:;(?<latency>.+);:;(?<col12>.+);:;(?<col13>.+);:;(?<site_id>.+);:;(?<site_uid>.+);:;

(Please note that i know the >< are incorrect but its the only way i could get it display on the forum! I am that new to this :))

however Splunk is not extracting col13, for this line. Other lines are extracted fine and i believe its due to the Curly Bracket. i have tried to extract the line by delimiting it /{ and entering all the other characters, however this has not worked.
Obviously the best way would have been to transform it however Splunk only supports one delimiting value and mine is ;:;

Thanks in advance.

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

woodcock
Esteemed Legend

Try this:

(?<date_time>\d{4}\.\d{2}\.\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3});:;(?<ip>\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+);:;(?<host>[^;]+);:;(?<requester_id>[^;]+);:;(?<req_id>[^;]+);:;(?<drm_domain_id>[^;]+);:;(?<status>[^;]+);:;(?<data>[^;]+);:;(?<request_type>[^;]+);:;(?<device_id>[^;]+);:;(?<latency>[^;]+);:;(?<col12>[^;]+);:;(?<col13>.+?);:;(?<site_id>[^;]+);:;(?<site_uid>[^;]+);:;

The problem is both greediness and some of your character classes (I use [^;] everywhere instead).

View solution in original post

0 Karma

woodcock
Esteemed Legend

Try this:

(?<date_time>\d{4}\.\d{2}\.\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3});:;(?<ip>\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+);:;(?<host>[^;]+);:;(?<requester_id>[^;]+);:;(?<req_id>[^;]+);:;(?<drm_domain_id>[^;]+);:;(?<status>[^;]+);:;(?<data>[^;]+);:;(?<request_type>[^;]+);:;(?<device_id>[^;]+);:;(?<latency>[^;]+);:;(?<col12>[^;]+);:;(?<col13>.+?);:;(?<site_id>[^;]+);:;(?<site_uid>[^;]+);:;

The problem is both greediness and some of your character classes (I use [^;] everywhere instead).

0 Karma

ssaenger
Communicator

Thanks Woodcock, that worked. 🙂

0 Karma

skoelpin
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You could always use a look-behind.. If your trying to extract the Device ID you can do

(?<Extracted_Field>\{DeviceId\=\'[A-Z0-9]{12}\'\}(?=\s is\null\sor))
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

According to www.regex101.com, your regex string is failing in the requester_id field. This regex works.

(?<date_time>\d{4}\.\d{2}\.\d{2}\s\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3});:;(?<ip>\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+);:;(?<host>[a-z0-9]+);:;(?<requester_id>[0-9A-Z]+);:;(?<req_id>.+);:;(?<drm_domain_id>.+);:;(?<status>.+);:;(?<data>.+);:;(?<request_type>.+);:;(?<device_id>.+);:;(?<latency>.+);:;(?<col12>.+);:;(?<col13>.+);:;(?<site_id>.+);:;(?<site_uid>.+);:;
---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Vibe-coding, AI, and Splunkcraft: Highlights from the .conf26 Builder Bar

If you stopped by the Builder Bar at .conf26, thank you! This year, we brought ...

Thanks for the Memories: .conf26 Took Learning to New Heights

Thank you, Splunk Community, for making .conf26 in Denver one for the books. From packed Splunk University ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...