Splunk Search

How to create a eval-based macro

hobbes3
Explorer

I am trying to approximate the distance between two points. Each point has a latitude, longitude, and elevation. Unfortunately Splunk can't do sines and cosines out of the box, so I had to use a Taylor polynomial in my function:

| eval lat0=$lat0$*pi()/180
| eval lat1=$lat1$*pi()/180
| eval lon0=$lon0$*pi()/180
| eval lon1=$lon1$*pi()/180
| eval coslat0=1-pow(lat0,2)/(2*1)+pow(lat0,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lat0,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslon0=1-pow(lon0,2)/(2*1)+pow(lon0,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lon0,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlat0=lat0-pow(lat0,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lat0,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lat0,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlon0=lon0-pow(lon0,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lon0,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lon0,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslat1=1-pow(lat1,2)/(2*1)+pow(lat1,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lat1,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval coslon1=1-pow(lon1,2)/(2*1)+pow(lon1,4)/(4*3*2*1)-pow(lon1,6)/(6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlat1=lat1-pow(lat1,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lat1,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lat1,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval sinlon1=lon1-pow(lon1,3)/(3*2*1)+pow(lon1,5)/(5*4*3*2*1)-pow(lon1,7)/(7*6*5*4*3*2*1)
| eval x0=$ele0$*coslat0*sinlon0
| eval x1=$ele1$*coslat1*sinlon1
| eval y0=$ele0$*sinlat0
| eval y1=$ele1$*sinlat1
| eval z0=$ele0$*coslat0*coslon0+6370
| eval z1=$ele1$*coslat1*coslon1+6370
| eval distance=sqrt(pow(x1-x0,2)+pow(y1-y0,2)+pow(z1-z0,2))

I would call this macro distance(6) with the 6 variables: lat0, lon0, ele0, lat1, lon1, ele1.

How do I create/use this macro so I can use it in a search like this:

index="gpx" source="/home/hobbes3/strava/a_nice_ride.gpx" | ... | eval distance=`distance(lat0, lon0, ele0, lat1, lon1, ele1)`
Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

sowings
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Strictly speaking, that's not an eval-based macro. You should simply be able to take the body of your eval statements and paste them into the macro definition. The name of the macro would be distance(6) indicating six args, and you'll want to line up your $lat0$, etc arguments with the args specifier of the macro.

Finally, you'll call it as | `distance(...)`, with the output field name of "distance" being implicit.

View solution in original post

sowings
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Strictly speaking, that's not an eval-based macro. You should simply be able to take the body of your eval statements and paste them into the macro definition. The name of the macro would be distance(6) indicating six args, and you'll want to line up your $lat0$, etc arguments with the args specifier of the macro.

Finally, you'll call it as | `distance(...)`, with the output field name of "distance" being implicit.

Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Where Innovation Takes Flight: The Splunk4Aviation Flight Sim Lands at .conf26

If you hear someone at .conf26 shouting "gear down, GEAR DOWN" across the show floor, you have found us.  The ...

Turn Cisco Telemetry Into Action with Cisco Data Fabric, powered by the Splunk ...

The surge in machine data is already hitting enterprise budgets, and the agentic era will only intensify it. ...

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...