Splunk Search

How can I change the order of the fields in my piechart?

tamduong16
Contributor

I have the following search:

....| eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"Under 250 kps", CallRate<=500,"Under 500 kps", CallRate<=750,"Under 750 kps", CallRate<=1000,"Under 1000 kps", CallRate<=1250,"Under 1250 kps",  CallRate>1250, "Above 1250 kps") | stats count by cs | eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls"

I want to make the piechart easy for my client to understand but the fields in the piechart organize themselves alphabetically. Is there a way I could sort them by the original way like above? The following is the result piechart:

alt text

I want it to be in this order:
Under 250 kps, Under 500 kps, Under 750 kps, Under 1000 kps, Under1250 kps, Above 1250 kps

0 Karma
1 Solution

tamduong16
Contributor

| eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"1.Under 250kps", CallRate<=500,"2.Under 500kps", CallRate<=750,"3.Under 750kps", CallRate<=1000,"4.Under 1000kps", CallRate<=1250,"5.Under 1250kps", CallRate>1250, "6.Above 1250kps") | stats count by cs| eval "cs"=replace('cs',"^(\d{1}).","")
| eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls"

View solution in original post

0 Karma

tamduong16
Contributor

| eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"1.Under 250kps", CallRate<=500,"2.Under 500kps", CallRate<=750,"3.Under 750kps", CallRate<=1000,"4.Under 1000kps", CallRate<=1250,"5.Under 1250kps", CallRate>1250, "6.Above 1250kps") | stats count by cs| eval "cs"=replace('cs',"^(\d{1}).","")
| eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls"

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

If your problem is resolved, please accept an answer (even if it's your own).

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

niketn
Legend

@tamduong16, sequence them in your case() function so that they get automatically sorted. Try the following:

| eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"1. Under 250 kps", CallRate<=500,"2. Under 500 kps", CallRate<=750,"3. Under 750 kps", CallRate<=1000,"4. Under 1000 kps", CallRate<=1250,"5. Under 1250 kps",  CallRate>1250, "6. Above 1250 kps") 
| stats count by cs 
| eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls"
____________________________________________
| makeresults | eval message= "Happy Splunking!!!"

tamduong16
Contributor

Thanks for the idea. It works but give me unwanted numeric at the beginning which I could write another eval expression to resolve that and work perfect. Here is the eval expression I added in.

| eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"1.Under 250kps", CallRate<=500,"2.Under 500kps", CallRate<=750,"3.Under 750kps", CallRate<=1000,"4.Under 1000kps", CallRate<=1250,"5.Under 1250kps", CallRate>1250, "6.Above 1250kps") | stats count by cs| eval "cs"=replace('cs',"^(\d{1}).","")
| eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls"

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You can force an order by adding a numeric field to sort against. See this example.

... | eval "cs"=case(CallRate<=250,"Under 250 kps", CallRate<=500,"Under 500 kps", CallRate<=750,"Under 750 kps", CallRate<=1000,"Under 1000 kps", CallRate<=1250,"Under 1250 kps", CallRate>1250, "Above 1250 kps") | eval sortOrder=case(CallRate<=250,1, CallRate<=500,2, CallRate<=750,3, CallRate<=1000,4, CallRate<=1250,5, CallRate>1250, 6) | stats count values(sortOrder) as sortOrder by cs | eval cs=cs+" -- "+count + "calls" | sort sortOrder
---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

tamduong16
Contributor

this doesn't work 😞
The fields in the piechart don't get sort and in addition it make everything harder to read.

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hmm... It works on my laptop under Splunk 6.6.2.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk Observability for AI

Don’t miss out on an exciting Tech Talk on Splunk Observability for AI!Discover how Splunk’s agentic AI ...

Splunk Enterprise Security 8.x: The Essential Upgrade for Threat Detection, ...

Watch On Demand the Tech Talk on November 6 at 11AM PT, and empower your SOC to reach new heights! Duration: ...

Splunk Observability as Code: From Zero to Dashboard

For the details on what Self-Service Observability and Observability as Code is, we have some awesome content ...