Splunk Search

Help With Sorting - Multiple Decimal Points

bgagliardi1
Path Finder

Hi,

I'm dealing with decimal points trying to determine the latest version of some software, but it's botching the integers after the first decimal point.

SoftwareVersion
5.0.1450.509
5.0.1450.8 <----Example
4.2.1330.31

I've tried stats list(field) and it still didn't provide the searching I was looking for. Thoughts? Please don't suggest an eval field separation per decimal 😉

0 Karma
1 Solution

acharlieh
Influencer

Assuming all of your version strings are the same number of components long, I would try the sort command, specifically telling it to sort the field as an IP address:

| sort ip(SoftwareVersion)

It seems to work well so long as all the versions are the same length:

| makeresults | eval versions=split("5.0.13.1,5.0.1450.509,4.2.1330.31,5.0.1450.510,5.0.1449.508,5.0.15.4",",") | mvexpand versions | sort ip(versions)

But it seems to get tripped up when the version strings are varying numbers of components long:

| makeresults | eval versions=split("5.0.13.1,5.0.1450.509.1,4.2.1330.31,5.0.1450.510,5.0.1449.508,5.0.15",",") | mvexpand versions | sort ip(versions)

I would then also file a P4 enhancement request asking for an additional sort option (possibly one based on semantic versioning).

View solution in original post

acharlieh
Influencer

Assuming all of your version strings are the same number of components long, I would try the sort command, specifically telling it to sort the field as an IP address:

| sort ip(SoftwareVersion)

It seems to work well so long as all the versions are the same length:

| makeresults | eval versions=split("5.0.13.1,5.0.1450.509,4.2.1330.31,5.0.1450.510,5.0.1449.508,5.0.15.4",",") | mvexpand versions | sort ip(versions)

But it seems to get tripped up when the version strings are varying numbers of components long:

| makeresults | eval versions=split("5.0.13.1,5.0.1450.509.1,4.2.1330.31,5.0.1450.510,5.0.1449.508,5.0.15",",") | mvexpand versions | sort ip(versions)

I would then also file a P4 enhancement request asking for an additional sort option (possibly one based on semantic versioning).

bgagliardi1
Path Finder

Thanks, I'll submit the P4 enhancement. Fortunately, I realized that the delineation between numbering orders was operating system based, OSX/Windows clients. I was able to do the sort correctly by running two searches specific to the OS', and then sorting that way.

I can confirm it was lexicographical ordering vs semantic versioning.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Classic British Rock Bands

This puzzle series (first published here) is based on extracting information from statements about well-known ...

New to the Community? Join Us for an Exclusive Post .conf26 Welcome Session (Plus a ...

Keep the .conf26 Energy Going: Welcome to the Splunk Community! Whether we scanned your badge at the Community ...

Accelerate Splunk App Development with AI

  Learn how to automate the repetitive parts of your build cycle.   Register to Attend   Join our Tech Talk ...