Splunk Search

Field extraction

splunkingsplun1
Explorer

I used the IFX tool in Splunk for some of my logs. I am trying to extract the severity of attacks in my IPS logs which are categorized (high, medium, low, info/informational). The logs look something like this:

Dec 25 08:58:14 172.16.48.100 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:21 WARNING 12572 Intrusions "SIP-Scanner-SIPVicious" UDP 188.138.34.198 5077 172.16.48.100 5060 1 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" occur 1 3 N/A 0 N/A high drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-0027-000052F2B407

Dec 25 08:55:21 172.16.48.150 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:21 WARNING 350 Anti-Scanning "TCP Scan" TCP 198.20.99.130 0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" ongoing 0 0 N/A 0 N/A medium drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-1E24-000052F089EF

Dec 25 08:55:26 172.16.48.200 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:20 WARNING 350 Anti-Scanning "TCP Scan" TCP 42.114.23.195 0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" ongoing 3 1 N/A 0 N/A medium drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-52BF-000F521C7F60

Dec 25 08:55:16 172.16.48.150 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:16 WARNING 350 Anti-Scanning "TCP Scan" TCP 198.20.99.130 0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" ongoing 2 0 N/A 0 N/A medium drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-1E24-000052F089EF

Dec 25 08:55:16 172.16.48.150 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:16 WARNING 350 Anti-Scanning "TCP Scan" TCP 198.20.99.130 0 0.0.0.0 0 1 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" start 0 0 N/A 0 N/A medium drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-1E24-000052F089EF

Dec 25 08:55:21 172.16.48.200 Netdefender: 25-12-2013 08:55:15 WARNING 350 Anti-Scanning "TCP Scan" TCP 198.143.173.176 0 0.0.0.0 0 0 Regular "Primary_Aggregate" term 0 0 N/A 0 N/A medium drop FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-6C70-000F521C7F60

This is the regex that IFX generated:

(?i)/.*? (?P<FIELDNAME>[a-z]+)(?= )

So to test I did:

sourcetype=netdefender | rex field=_raw "(?i)/.*? (?P<FIELDNAME>[a-z]+)(?= )"

For some reason the field FIELDNAME is extracting some occurrences of the values (term, ongoing, sampled, TCP). Does anyone have any ideas on a regex they can help me with?

1 Solution

gfuente
Motivator

Hello

You can use this regex instead:

\s(?<severity>high|medium|info|informational|low)\s

In your search

sourcetype=netdefender | rex field=_raw "\s(?<severity>high|medium|info|informational|low)\s"

Regards

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gfuente
Motivator

Hello

You can use this regex instead:

\s(?<severity>high|medium|info|informational|low)\s

In your search

sourcetype=netdefender | rex field=_raw "\s(?<severity>high|medium|info|informational|low)\s"

Regards

0 Karma

splunkingsplun1
Explorer

Yes that seems to be the obvious answer... Sorry! Low on caffeine and a beginning regexer is my excuse.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Your Feedback. Our Roadmap. Visit the PX Feedback Booth at .conf26

You use Splunk every day, come and help shape what's next.  Save Your Seat: Product-Focused Sessions at ...

Agentic SOC Triage: Investigating Splunk ES Notables with MCP Server and a Local LLM

The Problem: Too Many Alerts, Too Little Context Security operations teams running Splunk Enterprise Security ...

Painting a Clearer Picture: Creating Cross-Domain Visibility with AI Canvas

Watch Now Painting a Clearer Picture: Creating Cross-Domain Visibility with AI Canvas     Do you ever feel ...