Splunk Search

Event sampling and Count - accuracy?

dmoberg
Path Finder

I have a need for approximate statistics/metrics and am currently using Event Sampling, which drastically speeds up the queries. For queries that calculate averages this works great, but I also have a need to do counts. If you set the Event Sampling to for example 1:100, then Splunk seems to look at every 100 Events, which is also reflected in how many Events that are matched when doing 1:100 vs 1:1.

Example count with and without sampling:

1:100 = 26311
1:1 = 2623658
1:100 scaled up to 1:1 = 2631100
Diff = 7442, which is 0.3%

The Time Period was a previous hour (not the latest hour) as not to have incoming Events affect the Count.

0.3% difference is perfectly ok for my purpose.

 

Am I thinking of this correctly, or is there any risk of much bigger differences in Count (after upscaling the count)?

Tags (1)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

I think you're correct, at least with regard to event counts.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...