Splunk Search

Does anyone have an explanation for the differences in count with and without eval expression

gesa_behrens
Path Finder

Hello,

on searching for discrepancies in my dashboard I was able to cut down the problem to the following to searches. Maybe there is an explanation for it. The difference is in the count of TLSv1.2.
search with eval

search without eval

0 Karma
1 Solution

DavidHourani
Super Champion

Hi @gesa_behrens,

This is happening because a single transaction contains sometimes more than one ssl_protocol field values which means that if the condition matches on "-" everything gets replaced by the "HTTP" string.

You might want to run your eval before building the transaction then you'll be good on the count.

Cheers,
David

View solution in original post

0 Karma

DavidHourani
Super Champion

Hi @gesa_behrens,

This is happening because a single transaction contains sometimes more than one ssl_protocol field values which means that if the condition matches on "-" everything gets replaced by the "HTTP" string.

You might want to run your eval before building the transaction then you'll be good on the count.

Cheers,
David

0 Karma

gesa_behrens
Path Finder

wow, that was quick, and now that you mention it, this is absolutely clear to me, should have seen it my self.
Thanks so much!

0 Karma

DavidHourani
Super Champion

hahah most welcome 😉

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Tech Talk Recap | Mastering Threat Hunting

Mastering Threat HuntingDive into the world of threat hunting, exploring the key differences between ...

Observability for AI Applications: Troubleshooting Latency

If you’re working with proprietary company data, you’re probably going to have a locally hosted LLM or many ...

Splunk AI Assistant for SPL vs. ChatGPT: Which One is Better?

In the age of AI, every tool promises to make our lives easier. From summarizing content to writing code, ...