Splunk Search

Display trellis based on rows

Azwaliyana
Path Finder

This serach result will always return 3 rows. I want display all row but in trellis. 

For the first row, it is the memory utilization for CIC-1

For the second row, it is the memory utilization for CIC-2

For the third row, it is the memory utilization for CIC-3

How can I do the trellis to display based on rows?

Do I need to add new column "Name" and insert CIC-1, CIC-2, CIC-3 to respective rows?

 

Azwaliyana_0-1640145638333.png

 

Labels (1)
0 Karma

isoutamo
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi 

You could do it like this:

| makeresults 
| eval _raw="Name count
CIC-1 59
CIC-2 63
CIC-3 53"
| multikv forceheader=1
``` previous spteps genereates sample data based on your example ```
| stats sum(count) as count by Name

Also table Name, count should be ok for your last step, but definitely you are needing key + value for trellis (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/8.2.3/Viz/VisualizationTrellis)

Then select "Single value" for visualization and aggregate it by Name (not with count) when you are selecting Trellis.

isoutamo_0-1640163927089.png

 

r. Ismo 

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Meet Splunk Observability Studio: AI-Assisted OpenTelemetry Instrumentation Without ...

Instrumentation is usually the last step or even an afterthought when building out a project. The feature ...

Federated Search for Cisco Security and Analytics Logging (SAL) is now GA on Splunk ...

Federated Search for Cisco  Security Analytics and Logging (SAL) is now generally available as part of the ...

Your Path to AgenticOps: AI Experiences for Every Splunk Practitioner

Your Path to AgenticOps: AI Experiences for Every Splunk Practitioner   Join us for a demo-driven look at how ...