Splunk Search

Combining 2 different search results based on fields

selim
Path Finder

Hello,

I have 2 different searches for 2 different sourcetypes with field extractions. I'm doing the field extractions for search1 for xml data.

search1:

sourcetype=xmlapp | xmlkv

search2:

sourcetype=app2

I'd like to combine searches in such a way that when field2 from search2 does NOT match any existing field1 from search1, I need to create an alert. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Tags (2)
0 Karma
1 Solution

Ayn
Legend

I believe something like this should work:

sourcetype=xmlapp | xmlkv | search NOT [search sourcetype=app2 | rename field2 as field1 | fields field1]

View solution in original post

Ayn
Legend

I believe something like this should work:

sourcetype=xmlapp | xmlkv | search NOT [search sourcetype=app2 | rename field2 as field1 | fields field1]

Ayn
Legend

Hi @pramit46, I renamed it because the requirement was that values from field2 in the subsearch would be matched to values of field1 in the main search.

0 Karma

pramit46
Contributor

@Ayn, Can you please explain why did you rename the field2?
I also have the same question as that in Selim's comment. Any help would be appreciated.

0 Karma

selim
Path Finder

Thank you. That works for finding the events. So, how do display more fields (e.g. field1, field2, field3 from search#1 and field4, field5 from search#2) to the results so that I can display them in a table (or chart)? I tried fields command but was not successful.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Shape the Future of Splunk: Join the Product Research Lab!

Join the Splunk Product Research Lab and connect with us in the Slack channel #product-research-lab to get ...

Auto-Injector for Everything Else: Making OpenTelemetry Truly Universal

You might have seen Splunk’s recent announcement about donating the OpenTelemetry Injector to the ...

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Character substitutions with Regular Expressions

This challenge was first posted on Slack #puzzles channelFor BORE at .conf23, we had a puzzle question which ...