Splunk Enterprise Security

EnterpriseSecurity - DataModels

astatrial
Contributor

Hi everyone,

Introduction:

We have Palo Alto products, and we have also installed the appropriate add-on and apps. We mapped the data into the data models and the relevant data model for my question is the Web data model .

There is a field called dest in the DM, and for datamodel web (for palo alto) i need its value to be "dest_hostname" (the current value is "dest_ip"). The current value is relevant for the Network Traffic DM, therefore i don't want to change it. 

Question: 

Is it OK to add additional fields to the built-in data models of Splunk ES, or is it not recommended? 

What are the downsides of action like this? 

 

Thanks ! 

Labels (1)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Don't add fields to a DM unless absolutely necessary.  In your case, you should be able to add the dest field by creating a new field alias that maps dest_ip to dest.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

astatrial
Contributor

Hi @richgalloway ,

Thanks for the fast reply.

It is a bit problematic, as there is already a mapping from dest_ip to dest which is relevant for the "Network Traffic" data model. I need  the dest in Web data model to contain values from dest_hostname and not dest IP (for palo alto).

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Data Management Digest – December 2025

Welcome to the December edition of Data Management Digest! As we continue our journey of data innovation, the ...

Index This | What is broken 80% of the time by February?

December 2025 Edition   Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!    We’re back with this ...

Unlock Faster Time-to-Value on Edge and Ingest Processor with New SPL2 Pipeline ...

Hello Splunk Community,   We're thrilled to share an exciting update that will help you manage your data more ...