Splunk Enterprise Security

EnterpriseSecurity - DataModels

astatrial
Contributor

Hi everyone,

Introduction:

We have Palo Alto products, and we have also installed the appropriate add-on and apps. We mapped the data into the data models and the relevant data model for my question is the Web data model .

There is a field called dest in the DM, and for datamodel web (for palo alto) i need its value to be "dest_hostname" (the current value is "dest_ip"). The current value is relevant for the Network Traffic DM, therefore i don't want to change it. 

Question: 

Is it OK to add additional fields to the built-in data models of Splunk ES, or is it not recommended? 

What are the downsides of action like this? 

 

Thanks ! 

Labels (1)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Don't add fields to a DM unless absolutely necessary.  In your case, you should be able to add the dest field by creating a new field alias that maps dest_ip to dest.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma

astatrial
Contributor

Hi @richgalloway ,

Thanks for the fast reply.

It is a bit problematic, as there is already a mapping from dest_ip to dest which is relevant for the "Network Traffic" data model. I need  the dest in Web data model to contain values from dest_hostname and not dest IP (for palo alto).

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Splunk MCP & Agentic AI: Machine Data Without Limits

  Discover how the Splunk Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server can revolutionize the way your organization ...

Finding Based Detections General Availability

Overview  We’ve come a long way, folks, but here in Enterprise Security 8.4 I’m happy to announce Finding ...

Get Your Hands Dirty (and Your Shoes Comfy): The Splunk Experience

Hands-On Learning and Technical Seminars  Sometimes, you just need to see the code. For those looking for a ...