Splunk Enterprise Security

CIM help

splunkcol
Builder

I'm reviewing the logs to make sure the fields match the Splunk Enterprise Security CIM and datamodels.

The query shows me this percentage, understanding that they are the fields that are required versus the fields that it is finding, in this order of ideas, to adjust these fields I must create an alias or I must perform an "extract" either by regular expressions or tabs?

cp_log.png

cp_log2.png

0 Karma
1 Solution

rajashekar_s
Path Finder

Per documentation, for example the action field in network traffic datamodel, prescribed values are allowed, blocked and teardown. But you have many values under action field. As suggested above, you can create a calculated field like

| eval action=case((action="xxx" OR action="yyy"),"allowed",1=1,"blocked")

Doing this on all recommended fields will increase you compliance %

View solution in original post

rajashekar_s
Path Finder

Per documentation, for example the action field in network traffic datamodel, prescribed values are allowed, blocked and teardown. But you have many values under action field. As suggested above, you can create a calculated field like

| eval action=case((action="xxx" OR action="yyy"),"allowed",1=1,"blocked")

Doing this on all recommended fields will increase you compliance %

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Yes, you need to extract fields or create aliases to increase your CIM compliance.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf24 | Day 0

Hello Splunk Community! My name is Chris, and I'm based in Canberra, Australia's capital, and I travelled for ...

Enhance Security Visibility with Splunk Enterprise Security 7.1 through Threat ...

(view in My Videos)Struggling with alert fatigue, lack of context, and prioritization around security ...

Troubleshooting the OpenTelemetry Collector

  In this tech talk, you’ll learn how to troubleshoot the OpenTelemetry collector - from checking the ...