Splunk Enterprise Security

Auditing Datamodels

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Hello,

Is there a way to validate the fields used in the datamodel by how compliant they are with the current setup?
I am trying to validate and fix data models to receive optimum results in the Splunk ES.

Any tips regarding the issue will be appreciated,
Thanks

0 Karma
1 Solution

lakshman239
Influencer

Would this help? https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements

Also, for e.g. You can use | from datamodel "Authentication.Authentication" | fieldsummary for Authentication datamodel to check if all the datamodel fields are mapped and check the valued to see if they are related to your datasource.

View solution in original post

lakshman239
Influencer

if you are happy with the answers provided and/or your issue resolved, can you pls accept the response to close tracking on this?

0 Karma

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Sure, Sorry im new to Splunk Answers.

0 Karma

skalliger
Motivator

There is also the function fieldsummary.

0 Karma

lakshman239
Influencer

Would this help? https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/ES/5.2.2/Admin/Dashboardrequirements

Also, for e.g. You can use | from datamodel "Authentication.Authentication" | fieldsummary for Authentication datamodel to check if all the datamodel fields are mapped and check the valued to see if they are related to your datasource.

zekiramhi
Path Finder

Fantastic, Exactly what I needed. Thanks!

0 Karma

adonio
Ultra Champion
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Application management with Targeted Application Install for Victoria Experience

  Experience a new era of flexibility in managing your Splunk Cloud Platform apps! With Targeted Application ...

Index This | What goes up and never comes down?

January 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Splunkers, Pack Your Bags: Why Cisco Live EMEA is Your Next Big Destination

The Power of Two: Splunk + Cisco at "Ludicrous Scale"   You know Splunk. You know Cisco. But have you seen ...