Splunk Dev

What does this error mean regarding bundle conflicting timestamp?

luis290311
Explorer

Apparently splunk is behaving correctly, but sometimes using historical searches in order to reduce search time does not work. I only see in the splunkd log several similar messages like this:

ERROR DistributedBundleReplicationManager - HTTP response code 400 (HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request). Error applying delta=/opt/splunk/var/run/searchpeers/SV19APSP027-1520781662-1520781908.delta, searchHead=SV19APSP027, prevTime=1520781662, prevChksum=13407166704320477873, curTime=1520781908, curChksum=14856987335408760282: Latest bundle has conflicting timestamp: searchHead=SV19APSP027, actual=1520

But also other messages like this, although doesn't seem to be related:

ERROR ScriptRunner - stderr from '/opt/splunk/bin/python /opt/splunk/etc/apps/search/bin/sendemail.py "results_link=http://SV19APSP027:8000/app/search/search?q=%7Cloadjob%20rt_scheduler__acalasanz__search__RMD58cdfb2..." "ssname=SPK0003-US-Cambio de Contraseña" "graceful=True" "trigger_time=1520871180" results_file="/opt/splunk/var/run/splunk/dispatch/rt_scheduler_acalasanzsearch_RMD58cdfb26d24a1b7d9_at_1520870880_29688.0/per_result_alert/tmp_0.csv.gz"': ERROR:root:[Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution while sending mail to: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

prakash007
Builder

@luis290311: were you able to fix this issue, we are seeing this on our search-heads, we are 7.2.1

jessieb_83
Path Finder

@prakash007Did you ever find the solution?

0 Karma

p_gurav
Champion

What splunk version you are using?

luis290311
Explorer

version of Splunk: 7.02

By the way, I will add some additional information. In the moment of the problem, in the splunk's console it appears the following message:

Dispatch command: The number of search artifacts in the dispatch directory is higher than recommended (count=32536,, warning threshold=5000) and could have an impact on search performance. Remove excess search artifacts using "splunk clean-dispatch" CLI command, and review artifact retention policies in limits.conf and saved searches.conf. You can also raise this warning threshold in limits.conf / dispatch_dir_warning_size.

We followed this instructions but the same issue persists.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Free Professional Services for .conf26 Attendees

This year at .conf26, we are doing something a little different. We are bringing the best minds from ...

Defend at Machine Speed: Your Guide to Security Sessions at .conf26

Splunk .conf26   With threats moving at machine speed and attack surfaces expanding across hybrid ...

Where Innovation Takes Flight: The Splunk4Aviation Flight Sim Lands at .conf26

If you hear someone at .conf26 shouting "gear down, GEAR DOWN" across the show floor, you have found us.  The ...