Splunk AppDynamics

.net core microservices agent question

Blaine_Johnson
Path Finder

Sorry, but I'm brand new to this type of installation.  Is the .net core microservices agent install all that is necessary to instrument that particular application on that particular server, or is a standard .NET agent install necessary first?  If the .NET agent install is not necessary, do we lose the "machine agent" part of the install with the .net core microservices agent?

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

millerep
Contributor

I believe a microservices agent is all that is necessary for a microservices based application. Also, as with all "APM agents" the machine agent is a seperate install, and therefore licensed seperately (even though it comes "bundled."). So you won't lose the "machine agent" part. I believe microservices agents are bundled in groups of 5, but I am not sure if the "machine-agents" accompanying the apm agent is counted as 1 or as 5. 

View solution in original post

millerep
Contributor

I believe a microservices agent is all that is necessary for a microservices based application. Also, as with all "APM agents" the machine agent is a seperate install, and therefore licensed seperately (even though it comes "bundled."). So you won't lose the "machine agent" part. I believe microservices agents are bundled in groups of 5, but I am not sure if the "machine-agents" accompanying the apm agent is counted as 1 or as 5. 

Blaine_Johnson
Path Finder

Thank you, Eric. I appreciate the information.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Aligning Observability Costs with Business Value: Practical Strategies

 Join us for an engaging Tech Talk on Aligning Observability Costs with Business Value: Practical ...

Mastering Data Pipelines: Unlocking Value with Splunk

 In today's AI-driven world, organizations must balance the challenges of managing the explosion of data with ...

Splunk Up Your Game: Why It's Time to Embrace Python 3.9+ and OpenSSL 3.0

Did you know that for Splunk Enterprise 9.4, Python 3.9 is the default interpreter? This shift is not just a ...