Security

Search head pooling and local users

bckq
Path Finder

I'm testing search head pooling and I noticed, that when I add new user on first search head, second search head does not see that user and it cannot log in. I see directory of that user in the SHARED_PATH/etc/users/, but it is only visible on the user list by that search head, where I have created it. The same happen when I create user on the second search head - the first one does not see that user on the user list.
Is this a bug? Feature? How to fix it?

Tags (3)
0 Karma
1 Solution

norbert_hamel
Communicator

I don't think that we should call this a feature 🙂

We have been using search head pooling in the past with local authentication and the issue was the same. We have agreed to define new users only on one of the search heads and replicated the files with the users and roles by cron job once per day:

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc /passwd (User, passwords, role assignment)
$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/authorize.conf (role definition)

But this is just kind of work around. Later on we switched to a scripted authentication system.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

norbert_hamel
Communicator

I don't think that we should call this a feature 🙂

We have been using search head pooling in the past with local authentication and the issue was the same. We have agreed to define new users only on one of the search heads and replicated the files with the users and roles by cron job once per day:

$SPLUNK_HOME/etc /passwd (User, passwords, role assignment)
$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/authorize.conf (role definition)

But this is just kind of work around. Later on we switched to a scripted authentication system.

0 Karma

theunf
Communicator

It´s still happening on 6.1.1 but i could see that everything was being written on the nfs folder, not on the /opt/splunk folder.

Re-starting splunk does not solve it.

App instalation is automatic on the other search head, i mean, the one that was not installing the App.

0 Karma

saikatr
Path Finder

If obects like reports/alerts/dashboards are available across all search-heads in a pool, isn't it logical to assume that so would be the users? But they are not! (On 6.2.2)

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

[Puzzles] Solve, Learn, Repeat: Matching cron expressions

This puzzle (first published here) is based on matching timestamps to cron expressions.All the timestamps ...

Design, Compete, Win: Submit Your Best Splunk Dashboards for a .conf26 Pass

Hello Splunkers,  We’re excited to kick off a Splunk Dashboard contest! We know that dashboards are a primary ...

May 2026 Splunk Expert Sessions: Security & Observability

Level Up Your Operations: May 2026 Splunk Expert Sessions Whether you are refining your security posture or ...