Security

Does Splunk Forwarder need an interactive login?

danielteachesit
New Member

All, 

I've noticed by default that Splunk Forwarder gives itself /bin/bash  in /etc/passwd. 

e.g.

splunk:x:1001:1001:Splunk Server:/opt/splunkforwarder:/bin/bash

I changed it to the below and restarted:

splunk:x:1001:1001:Splunk Server:/opt/splunkforwarder:/sbin/nologin

Best I can tell there was no impact. Scripted inputs are working as it the monitor stanza's. 

Is there any reason I should leave Splunk user with a Shell? 

 

thanks!

Labels (1)
0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielteachesit,

the splunk user, assigned as owner to Splunk Universal Forwarders, doesn't need the Linux shell.

I usually disable it in my production installation.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

0 Karma

isoutamo
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You should also lock splunk user not only set shell to nologin. If/when need to use e.g. btool to check what those configurations are, just use "sudo -usplunk bash" command to get shell.

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

There is no need for the Splunk account to have a shell assigned to it.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...