Getting Data In

Where to convert GMT for cluster?

jwalzerpitt
Influencer

I installed the Splunk Add-On for AWS on my HF and created an input with a custom data type to ingest the AWS instance logs (basically Linux and Windows event logs), with a custom sourcetype of aws:s3:hostOS, but the problem is when I search the logs the timestamps are showing up as +4. I'm EST and the OS logs are GMT.

Do I need to modify the  props.conf on my HF to adjust for GMT, or on the SH cluster, or on both the HF and SH cluster?

Thx

Labels (3)
0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

It could be the TIME_FORMAT is not correct to the time zone is not detected correctly or maybe the TZ attribute needs to be added.

Please share the props.conf settings for the aws:s3:hostOS sourcetype.  Please also share some example events so we can see what the timestamps look like.

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.

jwalzerpitt
Influencer

Rich,

Thx for the reply.

The input I had to use was the custom data type that does not have a corresponding stanza in props.conf.

I was seeing events as follows with timestamps a few hours ahead:

Oct 22 22:10:01 ip-X-X-X-X systemd: Stopping User Slice of root.

 

 I created a props.conf file in the local dir of the add-on on my HF and added the following stanza:

[aws:s3:hostOS]
TZ = GMT

and now when I run a search the timestamps are as follows:

Oct 22 22:13:06 ip-x-x-x-x dhclient[3010]: XMT: Solicit on eth0, interval 127130ms.

 

I believe this fixed the issue

Thx

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Index This | Why did the turkey cross the road?

November 2025 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Enter the Agentic Era with Splunk AI Assistant for SPL 1.4

  🚀 Your data just got a serious AI upgrade — are you ready? Say hello to the Agentic Era with the ...

Feel the Splunk Love: Real Stories from Real Customers

Hello Splunk Community,    What’s the best part of hearing how our customers use Splunk? Easy: the positive ...