Getting Data In

When we need si* for summary indexing?

hochit
Path Finder

Is it necessary to use si* command for summary index and we need to make it as scheduled save?

Since I recall the saved search (it's not using si*), it still returns me the result as quick as I recall it from index=summary. Or Splunk actually is doing the trick for me?

rroberts
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

If you havent already seen it there is a good article here and link to video ... http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.2/Knowledge/Usesummaryindexing

"Note: You do not have to use the si- summary index search commands if you are proficient with the "old-school" way of creating summary-index-populating searches. If you create summary indexes using those methods and they work for you there's no need to update them. In fact, they may be more efficient: there are performance impacts related to the use of the si- commands, because they create slightly larger indexes than the "manual" method does."

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Hmm. It's not always true that si generates large results. For example, for computing medians and percentiles, si will likely be considerably more efficient than whatever you come up with manually. However, there will also be cases where you can't use si commands to summarize and retrieve the data as you need.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Application management with Targeted Application Install for Victoria Experience

  Experience a new era of flexibility in managing your Splunk Cloud Platform apps! With Targeted Application ...

Index This | What goes up and never comes down?

January 2026 Edition  Hayyy Splunk Education Enthusiasts and the Eternally Curious!   We’re back with this ...

Splunkers, Pack Your Bags: Why Cisco Live EMEA is Your Next Big Destination

The Power of Two: Splunk + Cisco at "Ludicrous Scale"   You know Splunk. You know Cisco. But have you seen ...