Getting Data In

Should we use heavy forwarders as an intermediate layer between the forwarders and the indexers?

danielbb
Motivator

We had this severe issue last week - What can be done when the parsing and aggregation queues are filled up?

Since it took us days to figure it out and the entire indexer cluster was compromised and it took 11 hours with Support on the line to detect it, I wonder whether in general an heavy forwarder layer is a good idea.

Tags (1)
0 Karma

mydog8it
Builder

What problem are you trying to solve by adding a heavy forwarder environment?

0 Karma

danielbb
Motivator

Reducing load on the indexers and isolating issues as I pointed to in the question...

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielbb,
I use HFs only when I need them (separated networks or syslogs), if I can I prefer to directly send logs from UFs to Indexers.

Maybe you should understand (with Support help) why you had the above problem, I don't think that an additional HF's layer could solve your problem, probably it could generate more queue problems.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

The OpenTelemetry Certified Associate (OTCA) Exam

What’s this OTCA exam? The Linux Foundation offers the OpenTelemetry Certified Associate (OTCA) credential to ...

From Manual to Agentic: Level Up Your SOC at Cisco Live

Welcome to the Era of the Agentic SOC   Are you tired of being a manual alert responder? The security ...

Splunk Classroom Chronicles: Training Tales and Testimonials (Episode 4)

Welcome back to Splunk Classroom Chronicles, our ongoing series where we shine a light on what really happens ...