Getting Data In

Search based on a source type overwritten on a per-event basis not returning any events

kagrze
Engager

I've implemented per-event source types assignment as described here: http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/5.0.3/Data/Advancedsourcetypeoverrides Basically it works. For events matching a REGEX source type is overwritten. Unfortunately when I use this source type in a search query no events are returned. Is it because override is done on a search-time instead of an index-time? Is it possible to solve this?

0 Karma
1 Solution

kagrze
Engager

OK, I've solved it. I made a mistake. Instead of FORMAT = sourcetype::<your_custom_sourcetype_value> I wrote FORMAT = <your_custom_sourcetype_value> (I forgot about sourcetype::). It was hard to spot because Splunk was correctly overwriting sourcetype field in search results.

View solution in original post

kagrze
Engager

OK, I've solved it. I made a mistake. Instead of FORMAT = sourcetype::<your_custom_sourcetype_value> I wrote FORMAT = <your_custom_sourcetype_value> (I forgot about sourcetype::). It was hard to spot because Splunk was correctly overwriting sourcetype field in search results.

bmacias84
Champion

It would help if you posted the stanzas in your .conf related to this.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

What’s New in Splunk AI: Volume 02

Welcome to the second edition of “What’s New in Splunk AI” where we look at the latest and greatest updates, ...

Splunk App Dev Quarterly Roundup: AI, Agents, and Innovation!

Another quarter, another wave of innovation. From complex integrations to pushing the limits ...

Value Insights: Now Generally Available in the CMC

Organizations are under pressure to move faster, control cost, expand AI adoption, and prove value with more ...