Getting Data In

Question about using virtual machines for intermediate forwarders

hacktastic
Path Finder

Hello folks,

I'm trying to puzzle out getting around SPL-34965 (WMI not load balancing), not inundating a single indexer (which is happening right now and screwing up my licensing) and keeping the the networking people happy by not asking for too many external IPs. I see that using an intermediate forwarder (HWF to avoid the done-key issue) is a solution. I completely understand why I wouldn't want to go virtual with the indexers and search head. But, can I get away with going virtual with intermediate forwarders? Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence?

We have about 725 LWFs sending to 3 indexers.

Thanks in advance.

0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Thanks for the Memories: .conf26 Took Learning to New Heights

Thank you, Splunk Community, for making .conf26 in Denver one for the books. From packed Splunk University ...

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...

Splunk Auto Ingestion Parallel Pipeline Scaling

Why this feature matters Many Splunk environments experience ingestion pressure long before the host is fully ...