Getting Data In

Question about using virtual machines for intermediate forwarders

hacktastic
Path Finder

Hello folks,

I'm trying to puzzle out getting around SPL-34965 (WMI not load balancing), not inundating a single indexer (which is happening right now and screwing up my licensing) and keeping the the networking people happy by not asking for too many external IPs. I see that using an intermediate forwarder (HWF to avoid the done-key issue) is a solution. I completely understand why I wouldn't want to go virtual with the indexers and search head. But, can I get away with going virtual with intermediate forwarders? Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence?

We have about 725 LWFs sending to 3 indexers.

Thanks in advance.

0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Yes, a VM for an intermediate forwarder should be fine, though you can probably use LWF just fine, as WMI shouldn't have any problems with buffered writes.

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf25 Global Broadcast: Don’t Miss a Moment

Hello Splunkers, .conf25 is only a click away.  Not able to make it to .conf25 in person? No worries, you can ...

Observe and Secure All Apps with Splunk

 Join Us for Our Next Tech Talk: Observe and Secure All Apps with SplunkAs organizations continue to innovate ...

What's New in Splunk Observability - August 2025

What's New We are excited to announce the latest enhancements to Splunk Observability Cloud as well as what is ...