Getting Data In

Many small files - high memory usage Splunk Forwarder- Is there a way to reduce?

nessaner
Explorer

Is there a way to reduce memory usage for splunk Forwarder? I have two directories with 57k files each (120Mb each) and After restarting service I checked Task manager and memory usage reach 2Gb. I can't reduce the number of files because I've already done that and can't reduce more. I'm sure that the issue is with those directories because after I delete them from inputs.conf memory reach only 100Mb. 

Labels (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @nessaner,

this is aknown windows problem related to the access to DNS that was solved in a past release.

If it's still present, ask to Splunk Support for the solution.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

View solution in original post

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @nessaner,

this is aknown windows problem related to the access to DNS that was solved in a past release.

If it's still present, ask to Splunk Support for the solution.

Ciao.

Giuseppe

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @nessaner,

good for you, see next time!

Ciao and happy splunking

Giuseppe

P.S.: Karma Points are appreciated 😉

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Laser Bananas and Edge Hubs: Exploring Operational Technology (OT) Data Through a ...

  OT is a different environment to traditional IT and can have interesting challenges when interfacing the ...

Event Series: Mastering AI Tokenomics and Splunk Agent Observability

Beyond the Black Box: Correlating AI Performance and Tokenomics with Splunk Agent Observability   As ...

span_metrics: The OpenTelemetry-Idiomatic Way to See Inside Your Services

You open a trace in Splunk Observability Cloud and everything looks fine. One root span, order-pipeline, with ...