Getting Data In

Forwarder management: deployment server vs Chef

responsys_cm
Builder

I have very little experience with chef. I have a client with very high security requirements. I was wondering if anyone in the community can explain the costs and benefits of using the deployment server vs chef. I'm assuming the customer would want to use client certs with the deployment server.

Thanks.

0 Karma

richgalloway
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

If the client is already using Chef then they should continue to do so. Chef can do much more than a deployment server can. Even if they use a DS, they'll still need Chef to update the forwarder executable itself (something a DS can't do).

---
If this reply helps you, Karma would be appreciated.
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

At .conf26, Don’t Just See What’s Next. Help Shape It at Innovation Labs.

Long before a new capability reaches the keynote stage, it begins as an idea waiting to be tested. At ...

Forwarder Topology Guidance: Intermediate HF vs Intermediate UF

If you are designing a Splunk forwarding architecture, it can be tempting to place a Universal Forwarder (UF) ...

Data Management Digest – August 2026

Data Management Digest   Welcome to the August 2026 edition of Data Management Digest! August was a big month ...