Getting Data In

Filter Unparsed Cooked Data

ephemeric
Contributor

Hello all,

I have tested with cooked, unparsed, encrypted data from a Universal Forwarder and filtering works.

The indexer input is however splunktcp-ssl and it works.

As per docs:

[tcp-ssl:]
Use this stanza type if you are receiving encrypted, unparsed data from a forwarder or third-party system.
Set to the port on which the forwarder/third-party system is sending unparsed, encrypted data.

This input broke event filtering.

Can I just go ahead and use splunktcp-ssl and assume all is good?

Thank you.

0 Karma

Ayn
Legend

You should use splunktcp type connections for receiving data from Universal Forwarders. tcp-ssl is as is implied in the docs mostly for 3rd party products. There's no need to use it unless you know what you're doing and why.

0 Karma

Ayn
Legend

UF doesn't do parsing so that shouldn't be a problem.

ephemeric
Contributor

We did use it in the past to do event filtering which wouldn't work for parsed data from a LF.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Federated Search for Snowflake Is Now Generally Available on Splunk Cloud Platform

Splunk is excited to announce the General Availability (GA) of Federated Search for ...

Help Us Build Better Splunk Regex Puzzles (And Win Prizes!)

If you’ve spent any time in the Splunk Community Slack, you’ve likely seen our resident Splunk Trust ...

Fuel Your Journey: What’s Waiting for You at the .conf26 Acceleration Station

Navigating the show floor at .conf26 isn't just about keynotes and technical breakout sessions; it's also ...