Deployment Architecture

Using Heavy Forwarder as a Relay

dokaas_2
Communicator

I've seen the warnings of having UFs sending HFs and relaying to a index cluster. The objection seems to be around uneven distribution of events from the HFs to the indexers. However, doesn't setting the HFs outputs.conf variables: indexAndForward=false and autoLBFrequency=30 fix those issues?

Basically, have the UFs load balance to a pool of HFs and the pool of HFs load balance to the index cluster. If you do this, will you still have problems?

Labels (1)
0 Karma

isoutamo
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
Hi
Here is one presentation about event distribution. https://www.slideshare.net/Splunk/best-practices-for-splunk-deployments
I think that this explain that.
r. Ismo
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Developer Spotlight with Denis Gladkikh

From Splunk Engineer to Kubernetes App Builder Denis GladkikhWhat happens when a lifelong developer turns a ...

Governing Enterprise AI, Bringing Cisco Telemetry Home, and More from Splunk Lantern

Splunk Lantern is Splunk’s customer success center that provides practical guidance from Splunk experts on key ...

Agentic SOC Triage: Investigating Splunk ES Notables with MCP Server and a Local LLM

The Problem: Too Many Alerts, Too Little Context Security operations teams running Splunk Enterprise Security ...