Deployment Architecture

Using Heavy Forwarder as a Relay

dokaas_2
Communicator

I've seen the warnings of having UFs sending HFs and relaying to a index cluster. The objection seems to be around uneven distribution of events from the HFs to the indexers. However, doesn't setting the HFs outputs.conf variables: indexAndForward=false and autoLBFrequency=30 fix those issues?

Basically, have the UFs load balance to a pool of HFs and the pool of HFs load balance to the index cluster. If you do this, will you still have problems?

Labels (1)
0 Karma

isoutamo
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
Hi
Here is one presentation about event distribution. https://www.slideshare.net/Splunk/best-practices-for-splunk-deployments
I think that this explain that.
r. Ismo
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Best Practices: Splunk auto adjust pipeline queue

When you enable autoAdjustQueue in Splunk, maxSize should be understood as the queue size Splunk starts with ...

Laser Bananas and Edge Hubs: Exploring Operational Technology (OT) Data Through a ...

  OT is a different environment to traditional IT and can have interesting challenges when interfacing the ...

Event Series: Mastering AI Tokenomics and Splunk Agent Observability

Beyond the Black Box: Correlating AI Performance and Tokenomics with Splunk Agent Observability   As ...