Deployment Architecture

Using Heavy Forwarder as a Relay

dokaas_2
Communicator

I've seen the warnings of having UFs sending HFs and relaying to a index cluster. The objection seems to be around uneven distribution of events from the HFs to the indexers. However, doesn't setting the HFs outputs.conf variables: indexAndForward=false and autoLBFrequency=30 fix those issues?

Basically, have the UFs load balance to a pool of HFs and the pool of HFs load balance to the index cluster. If you do this, will you still have problems?

Labels (1)
0 Karma

isoutamo
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust
Hi
Here is one presentation about event distribution. https://www.slideshare.net/Splunk/best-practices-for-splunk-deployments
I think that this explain that.
r. Ismo
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...