All Apps and Add-ons

Does Add-on AMQP Messaging Modular Input now implement AMQP 0.9.1 or 1.0?

mathiask
Communicator

Hi there does this addon now implement AMQP 0.9.1 or 1.0?
Im now assuming 0.9.1 because that is what RabbitMQ officially supports. Or does this now mean that it also supports AMQP compliant brokers other than rabbitMQ, using the rabbitMQ (experimental?) client?

AMQP modular input
"It utilizes the RabbitMQ Java client library(v3.3.3) , but can be used against any AMQP v1.0 compliant broker"

RabbitMQ
"RabbitMQ implements AMQP 1.0 via an experimental plugin. However, AMQP 1.0 is a completely different protocol than AMQP 0-9-1 and hence not a suitable replacement for the latter. RabbitMQ will therefore continue to support AMQP 0-9-1 (and its close relatives 0-9 and 0-8) indefinitely. RabbitMQ is unlikely ever to support AMQP 0-10."
[link removed not enough karma] see rabbitMQ website specifications

Regards
Mathias Karlsson

1 Solution

Damien_Dallimor
Ultra Champion

AMQP Modular Input supports AMQP v 0.9.1 . 0.9 . 0.8

View solution in original post

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

We're currently looking to connect Splunk with Microsoft Service Bus 1.1 which supports AMQP v1.0.

While looking for an alternative to the AMQP Modular Input we've considered amending the JMS Modular Input http://apps.splunk.com/app/1317/ with AMQP v1.0 capable JMS libraries as per http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/service-bus-java-how-to-use-jms-api-amqp/

However, so far we've had little success in getting the two parties to play along nicely... likely due to a lack of JMS expertise.

If Mathias or anyone else gets that to work we'd be very interested 🙂

Damien_Dallimor
Ultra Champion

AMQP Modular Input supports AMQP v 0.9.1 . 0.9 . 0.8

mathiask
Communicator

Thanks. Will test it soon with RabbitMQ

I this case I'm not sure what you try to say in the documentation with " ... can be used against any AMQP v1.0 compliant broker ... "
As far as I understand the description on the RabbidMQ website is that v1.0 is very different from v0.9.x. Does that mean that compliant brokers are backwards compatible ?

0 Karma

Damien_Dallimor
Ultra Champion

Simply just docs gremlins. I was trying 1.0 in intial dev and prototyping before reverting back to 0.9.

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Persistent Queue at TcpOut — One of Splunk's Most Practical Features

Splunk introduced persistent queueing at the tcpout layer as one of the most practical resilience features in ...

Skip the Awkward Silence: Have a .conf-ersation at .conf26

Picture this. You arrive at .conf26 already having your socializing and networking plans mapped out. No ...

Rethinking Zero Trust: From Product Purchases to Logical Control Evidence

Implementing Zero Trust (ZT) across complex environments often falters at the very beginning due to a ...