Splunk Search

"Invalid Regex: no named extraction" in the interactive field extractor

dinh
Path Finder

What is wrong with this regex?

(?P<AUTH_PIN_TYPE>[^ ]+)( [^ ]+){2}$

The interactive field extractor gives this error: Invalid regex: no named extraction at position 24 (i.e., "( [^ ]+){2..."). Expected "(?Ppattern)"

Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

As far as I can see, and testing in Splunk 4.0.8 using rex, EXTRACT in props.conf, and a REPORT clause, there appears to be nothing wrong with it (assuming it correctly captures your fields). Where are you seeing this error?

Update: in the IFE, as GpMidi says, you can use only named captures, i.e., implicit captures like (...) are not accepted. If you just wish to group (without an implicit capture), use (?:...) instead. So your regex in this case would have to be:

(?P<AUTH_PIN_TYPE>[^ ]+)(?: [^ ]+){2}$

View solution in original post

dinh
Path Finder

blah blah blah MATCH_ME foo bar(end of line)

0 Karma

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

As far as I can see, and testing in Splunk 4.0.8 using rex, EXTRACT in props.conf, and a REPORT clause, there appears to be nothing wrong with it (assuming it correctly captures your fields). Where are you seeing this error?

Update: in the IFE, as GpMidi says, you can use only named captures, i.e., implicit captures like (...) are not accepted. If you just wish to group (without an implicit capture), use (?:...) instead. So your regex in this case would have to be:

(?P<AUTH_PIN_TYPE>[^ ]+)(?: [^ ]+){2}$

dinh
Path Finder

I see it on Splunk 4.0.9(74233) when I put it in the interactive field extractor.

0 Karma

GpMidi
Explorer

I belive you need to use all named captures. ie (?P...)

0 Karma

hulahoop
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Can you provide more details? What are you trying to match?

0 Karma
Career Survey
First 500 qualified respondents will receive a $20 gift card! Tell us about your professional Splunk journey.
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Tech Talk Recap | Mastering Threat Hunting

Mastering Threat HuntingDive into the world of threat hunting, exploring the key differences between ...

Observability for AI Applications: Troubleshooting Latency

If you’re working with proprietary company data, you’re probably going to have a locally hosted LLM or many ...

Splunk AI Assistant for SPL vs. ChatGPT: Which One is Better?

In the age of AI, every tool promises to make our lives easier. From summarizing content to writing code, ...