Splunk Search

help on stats by

jip31
Motivator

hi

I need to understand why I execute the first search I have much more events in "Number of CPU alerts" count than in the second search?
As you can see, the first search stats the data "by host SITE" while the second stats the data only by host
What I dont understand is that every host has is proper SITE so normaly like I am doing the same kind of count i should have the same result?
Thanks for your help

 `CPU` 
| stats count(process_cpu_used_percent)  as "Number of CPU alerts" by host SITE 
 | search host=TUTU
Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Karma
1 Solution

jip31
Motivator

In fact the problem is that in the CMDB where I pick up the field "SITE" (I use a lookup not visible in my example) there is always 3 events for the same host even if its the same SITE!
So when I am doing just "by host" I have the good results but when I am doing "by host SITE" I have three times more events!
If "by host" I have 3 events, by "host SITE" I have 9 events
So like I need to use "by host SITE" how to avoid this side effects??

View solution in original post

0 Karma

jip31
Motivator

In fact the problem is that in the CMDB where I pick up the field "SITE" (I use a lookup not visible in my example) there is always 3 events for the same host even if its the same SITE!
So when I am doing just "by host" I have the good results but when I am doing "by host SITE" I have three times more events!
If "by host" I have 3 events, by "host SITE" I have 9 events
So like I need to use "by host SITE" how to avoid this side effects??

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @jip31,
at first, if the relation between host and SITE is 1:1 you don't neel to put it in the BY clause of the stats but you can put it in values(SITE) AS SITE.

Anyway, you can check it inserting dc in stats

`CPU` 
| stats dc(SITE) AS dc_SITE count(process_cpu_used_percent)  as "Number of CPU alerts" by host
| where dc_SITE>1

in this way you can check if there are hosts with more than one SITE.
Then you have to decide if it's acceptable for you to have more SITEs for each host or not.

Ciao,
Giuseppe

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @jip31,
it would be easy for me to suggest that you update the CMDB based on the indications obtained from the search by eliminating duplicates and probably would be the best approach.
Alternatively, you need to decide which path to follow:

  • BY host
  • BY host SITE

Let me know if I can help you in another way.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

0 Karma
Got questions? Get answers!

Join the Splunk Community Slack to learn, troubleshoot, and make connections with fellow Splunk practitioners in real time!

Meet up IRL or virtually!

Join Splunk User Groups to connect and learn in-person by region or remotely by topic or industry.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Make Your Machine Data AI-Ready in Splunk

Every team is getting ready for AI agents.   Thursday, November 12, 2026  |  11AM  PST / 2PM EST   ...

Splunk Asynchronous Forwarding Explained

Splunk asynchronous forwarding is often misunderstood as simply setting autoLBVolume. That is not quite right. ...

How to Monitor AI Agents with Splunk Agent Observability

Let’s say I’m running a travel planning AI app in production. A user asks for three concise hotel options in ...